The Process Of Learning A Musical Instrument Education Essay

The overhaul Of learnedness A Musical Instrument Education EssayThe influence of learn a musical actor has changed a the great unwashed in the recent years, and it is e rattling thanks to the profit. Before websites with sufficient breeding on how to learn wee-wee first come to deliver, young adepts of the guitar arts could only count on themselves. Finding and acquirement their favorite song was not depend qualified a hardly a(prenominal) clicks away, and utilize such music softwargon as Guitar Pro was not quite an option as it simply did not exist. The briny challenge was to learn the found song using only their hear and then transcribe it. This attainment bidding involved good aural and transcribing skills and could only be developed by transcribing new songs. At that cadence books were in semiprecious source of association.Things look way different now. at that place ar thousands of websites with a variety of corporeals. But which way of learn would be t o a greater extent beneficial to the learner?This paper exit try to examine how the diverse ways of erudition r each(prenominal) evolved in the ago couple decades and how oft influence on them has Internet, and the sources it provides, had.Here ar a few examples just to illustrate advantages and disadvantages of the Internet in the attainment butt there argon a lot of functionful resources such as DVDs, music softw be, trade tracks, aural tests only when on the some other hand the vast flak world power poses the danger of treating the Internet as a primary source of acquaintance whereas its content merchantman approximately(a) eons be misleading because a lot of online tutors lack formal teaching qualifications. Finding reading doesnt require some(prenominal) effort and limits the learner to thoughtless consumption of unnecessary entropy, additionally theres no place for research which is everlastingly crucial in the culture process. The Internet to a fault la cks the aspect of an interaction with other musicians which is vital when it comes to developing peerlesss musicality. in that respect are a lot more arguments for and against the Internet as a teaching resource. In my speech I impart test and read these two different cultivation processes in assign to establish how they buzz off evolved since the times when Internet teaching resources didnt exist on such a vast scale up until now.INTRODUCTIONIn this paper, I leave behind cover and respect how the guitar nurture process has evolved over the past 30 years. I volitioninging present, analyse and compare two different approaches to encyclopaedism guitar. For the purpose of this study, the first approach entrust be referencered to as conventional and the import one lead be known as modern-day, e- acquisition or online education. It is crucial to con posturer the difference between the two.The traditional approach to learning guitar all important(p)ly dominated in the pre-Internet era of 70s and 80s, when teaching resources were very limited. However, in no way did the restricted availability of teaching materials affect assimilators willingness to research and learn the new instrument. It was just the specific approach towards companionship science that was very different to the one that we know and are use to nowadays. wherefore my main focus will be on researching the pre-Internet times, which I refer to as the classic rock era, in order to examine and assess the guitar learning methods of that period.The modern approach to learning guitar has first come to the picture with the arrival of the Internet. The Internet revolutionised and reshaped the whole guitar learning model. Unlimited teaching resources (online lessons, videos, instructional DVDs, YouTube, digital sheet music) are just a few clicks away. Students are no longer ask to leave their bedrooms to be fitted to pass water musical knowledge. With the vast availability o f technologically advanced software and equipment everyone sewer effortlessly learn an instrument. But is the previous sentence entirely legitimate? Is it possible to learn an instrument and develop ones musicality with come in interacting with other musicians? Again, I will research the area of the e-learning process in order to conduct word and assess what effects, if any, it has on modern musicians and to be able to answer the in a amplyer place interrogative moods.To before long summarise, there are two major hassles my dissertation will addressThe differences between the modern instrument learning process and the one of the classic rock eraBy contrasting the two supra processes I will decide which one is more beneficial to the learnerSome of the research questions this paper will examine and answer areHow important is it to learn an instrument and develop ones skills and musicality by interacting and performing with other musicians (the traditional approach)?Is the sol itary way of attaining knowledge with the help of modern technology and the Internet more supportive in the learning process?Does the kind aspect of group learning associated with the traditional approach make for an important role in the guitar learning process?To answer these questions I will conduct a sociological analysis of this matter using open books on the importance of team pee in the learning process and other necessary sources. This analysis will allow me to understand how the two contrary learning methods work under various social circumstances and will help me to arrest which of the studied methods is more valuable to the music disciple.Furthermore I will conduct a feed of adequately structured and in-depth interviews with current tutors who were either educated back in the 70s or in the modern Internet era. It will shed some light on the issues I am concerned with and will help to determine the usefulness of the two tested learning methods. Some admonitory que stions I might ask are Was the lack of teaching resources a discouraging or motivating factor in the guitar learning process?, What kind of research methods did you use to obtain the essential information undeniable for the learning?Additionally I will write a gip questionnaire for the current music students, which will be inclusive of simple scarcely disporting questions that will attract the moveents attention. The aim of this survey will be to assess young learners views on the usefulness of the Internet as a teaching tool and to determine how the online learning translates into students ability to function in the real music world.In order to illustrate the aims and objectives of my dissertation, I will answer a few simple questionsWho will benefit from my investigation?My main aim is to determine, by analysing and comparing two well-known instrument learning approaches from two different time periods, how the beginning guitar players can get the or so out of guitar lessons .In what sense will they benefit? first I will combine the final dissertation outcomes together, then I will apply these findings to some problems and issues the new student faces objet dart learning an instrument. As a conclusion, I will try to work out the trump approach to learning guitar by evaluating the results of my research.In what sense will my contribution add to what is already known?To address the main dissertation question (which of the two learning methods is more beneficial?), I will conduct research that is primarily based on interviews and questionnaires. After compendium and analysing all necessary info, I will compare the significance of my findings against the already existing data and establish how my study can contribute to what is already known.What are the constraints or limitations of the study?The major limitation is the fact that it is well impossible to find academic books with sufficient information about guitar learning methods back in the classic rock era, therefore primary data will be collected from interviews with tutors of the 70s.The followers paragraph will briefly describe the content of this dissertationThe first chapter will consist of a review of what is already known and of the main problems and issues. It will cover past research and studies from pertinent books and magazines. It will similarly summarise what other researchers provoke written and print slightly the topic of my study. Critical judgment will be used here to present my opinions on relevant issues.The second chapter will describe and evaluate methods and techniques of research used for the purpose of this paper. As mentioned before, it will mainly consist of interviews and questionnaires. The reason for using such methods will also be justified in this section.In the third section, a comparative study of two contrary guitar learning processes along with the data obtained in the previous section will be presented. Arguments and counter-arguments will also be contrasted in this chapter.In the fourth section, dissertation findings will be interpreted. The difference between my findings and those of other people will also be presented.The last chapter will consist of a summary of main findings and conclusions.Bibliography will be included.CHAPTER 1traditional approach vs. modern approachTraditional approachThe first chapter will consist of a review of what is already known and of the main problems and issues. It will cover past research and studies from relevant books and magazines. It will also summarise what other researchers have written and published around the topic of my study. Critical judgment will be used here to present my opinions on relevant issues.There are legion(predicate) publications available on the Internet that describe advantages and disadvantages of online and traditional learning, however, its not but been proved which of the above-mentioned learning methods is more efficient. Although there arent eno ugh findings that would determine superiority, equivalence or non-inferiority of one approach to other, one can fence that the modern approach is not a replacement for the traditional learning process. Undoubtedly, there are countless benefits associated with e-learning however, there are a few aspects of it that seem to be problematic when present side by side with the traditional learning. What the modern guitar learning process certainly lacks is the ability to hurry group interactions which are the crucial part of music tuition. It might be possible, with other branches of knowledge, to eliminate the interactive part of learning but when it comes to music, its super unlikely for a music student to perform well when the collaborative factor is omitted. It is commonly known that students tend to attain knowledge most powerfully when they are given the opportunity to interact with other students. such(prenominal) interactions among students also help to develop strong group problem work out skills. For that reason, the importance of meeting students learning peers, exchanging ideas and sharing common musical experiences can never be underestimated.In an early stage of musical education, it is always advisable to provide young students with proper guidance from tutors. Carrying out the initial study through the opposite approach allows creating more controlled environment for children to be taught in. Of course, it should not be assumed that the more controlled environment and guidance are not achievable through the process of online learning, but the fact, that there is very little control, which a teacher wields on a student, might rede the superiority of the traditional learning over e-learning. Teachers guidance is there to help students explore their limitations and objectives and also increase their motivation and provide opportunities for students to share their own(prenominal) learning goals and objectives.While discussing the two tested lear ning methods, there is another important issue that needs to be taken into consideration. In order to fully engage in any form of Internet-based learning activity, a student must absolutely have a very high motivation. Its mainly due to the fact that the link between a student and a teacher is missing in this type of learning environment. This problem does not seem to occur with the traditional learning process, where a tutors main responsibility is to encourage and reinforce rough-and-ready study habits of students. Another important aspect of the face-to-face mode, rarely achievable with other learning modes, is the students ability to recognise their strengths and limitations and understand their learning goals and objectives.A further problem, the learner faces while utilising the Internet for educational purposes, is the overwhelming amount of information and knowledge available online in an instant. Accessibility of all imaginable knowledge should predominantly be regarded as an improvement but there are also some evident disadvantages associated with it. For young music students, such vast amount of knowledge and data is simply unmanageable. Indisputably, learners taking first steps in music education need to have well-developed analytical, organisational and learning resources skills in order to be able to filter through and select the right resources for learning. Obviously, the child learning an instrument is not expected to possess such complex skills, so this is why the personal guidance from a tutor or learning peers cannot be substituted with the Internet.Modern approachIt is without a doubt that the overall interest in online education has grown tremendously in recent years. However, the question that needs to be asked here is how effective online learning is compared to traditional learning. There are not many findings that could unambiguously answer this question but a very recent study, published in 2009, suggests that online learners perfor m middling better than students in traditional face-to-face classrooms (Church 2009).This study was conducted by SRI multinational for the US Department of Education. It analysed research that compared online and conventional learning at institutions of higher(prenominal) education between 1996 and 2008 (Means 2009).The key finding of this study, as interpreted and presented by Jodi Church (2009) in an article entitled Is online education more effective than traditional learning?, shows that students doing partial or all course work online rank, on average, in the 59th percentile, meaning better than 59% of all those who were scored whereas students in traditional classrooms ranked in the 50th percentile.While analysing these findings, it can be rightly assumed that traditional learning is not necessarily the best way of maintaining a learning process. For that reason, e-learning models are regarded as good educational models that constantly evolve and improve, offering music stud ents better tools and opportunities to achieve their educational goals.But how can we define a good educational model? A good educational model must be able to provide the student with satisfactory learning environment, in which they are able to think by themselves, to be fictive and original, to solve problems and to interact with their purlieu in a collaborative way. With its flexibility, accessibility and convenience e-learning seems to be the ideal way to develop these objectives (Rashty 2001).Referring to past studies on online learning David Rashty (2001) points out that students have expressed higher satisfaction from the computing machine-mediated learning, and rated the learning as more effective than in the traditional framework.A further analysis of the modern approach reveals a number of characteristic features of this model, which are superior to traditional learning. These are listed below Active learning and its main advantages (Rashty 2001) It requires the learne r to be intensely involved in the learning process, which is due to the use of a computer and a physical involvement in gathering and sending information It requires the learner to be socially and cognitively involved in the learning process, as a direct result of the need to discuss with and respond to other online learners It enhances and magnifies the attainment of knowledge and requires the learner to be able to train and analyse the information It is not time-restricted, so it allows the learner enough time for developing complex concepts and digesting the information It allows the learner to control the learning process It allows receiving and processing information at convenient times It requires learners responsibility and green light in advancing in the learning process and forwarding knowledge Creative thinking as an important element of online learning (Rashty 2001) Online learning (OL) improves the learners ability to seek out gaps in information, to propose, examine a nd improve ideas and to discuss the results OL enhances learners creativity by encouraging him/her to take risks and to commit to tasks OL supports learners curiosity and desolation to new ideas OL enables the learner to degagely express himself/herself in an environment that is free from many psychological inhabitations existing in the traditional classroom OL enhances the learners creative thinking processes by utilising the Internets developing technology and its tools for the purpose of gaining and processing information Creative thinking (Rashty 2001)There are various techniques, which have been put to use in learning throughthe Web which encourage the development of critical thinking. Critical thinking wasintended to enable a survival of the fittest of information, the ability to choose among severalsolutions, the ability to assess the force of a given argument, and the ability to reachdecisions. The critical thinking grows stronger also following use of graphics andhyperte xt, which refine the hierarchy and logical structure of the concepts on theWeb.The process required from the student when searching for information on theWeb, which includes define the query, carrying out the search operation,examining the results and sifting and pinpointing the question, also refines thestudents critical thinking.Any other operation by which the student identifies main points, searches forcause and effect, finds patterns and relationships between data, creates a timetable,examines costs versus products all these are also actions which refine thestudents critical thinking.eLearning also includes advantages which are not found in traditional learning, such as time for digesting the information and responding, enhanced communication among the learners, both as regards woodland and as regards urgency, knowledge being acquired and transferred among the learners themselves, the ability to conduct an open discussion, where each learner gets more of an equal standing th an in a face-to-face discussion, access to information and to discussion ability, responses may be made around the clock with no restrictions, a higher motivation and involvement in the process on the part of the learners.The very use of technology for learning has been found to have a positive effect on the students loyalty to the learning process. Also, use of technology creates a greater commitment on the students part to learning.The following table summarizes several opinions regarding the comparison between traditional learning and eLearningTraditional LearningeLearningClassroom DiscussionsThe teacher usually dialog more than the studentThe student talks at least as much as or more than the teacherLearning coverThe learning is conducted with the whole class participating there is almost no group or individual studyMost of the learning process takes place in groups or by the individual student.Subject occasionThe teacher conducts the lesson according to the study program an d the existing curriculumThe student participates in determining the subject matter the studying is based on various sources of information, including web data banks and net-experts located by the student.Emphases in the Learning ProcessThe students learn what and not how the students and the teachers are busy completing the required subject matter quota the students are not involved in inquiry-based education and in solving problems, but rather in tasks set by the teacher.The students learn how and less what the learning includes research study which combines searching for and hoard information from web data banks and authorities on the communications network the learning is better connected to the real world, the subject matter is richer and includes material in different formats.MotivationThe students motivation is low, and the subject matter is nonadjacent from them.The students motivation is high due to the involvement in matters that are close together(predicate) to them a nd to the use of technology.Teachers RoleThe teacher is the authorityThe teacher directs the student to the information. lieu of LearningThe learning takes place within the classroom and the schoolThe learning takes place with no fixed locationLesson StructureThe teacher dictates the structure of the lesson and the division of timeThe structure of the lesson is affected by the group dynamics.