Premchand’s Goodan and Dickens Hard Times Essay

There is always unremitting impression which brings Premchands Goodan and dickens strenuous generation in framework as an entirety. Goodan which was written 1936, in a nutshell travels on the apprehension of a aliveness of a farmer, roughly importantly oppression in the hand of crystalize structure. As a critic points out the life of Indian village and the farmer seems to be trapped in the net woven by the landlords, moneylenders and police i. e. suggesting restate standard of the capitalists. demon correspondingly voices social injustice and problem in the capitalist framework most importantly oppression of the lower class by the upper class. A critic suggested that both the writers Premchand and two in the beginning concerns to voicing the social reform, consciously trying to draw a sleep in the midst of idealism and realism as a whole.In Hard Times which was written in 1854, picture Victorian industrial society, and explicate a troop of radical critique of industrial E ngland. Siengfried A.Schulz in his parole Premchand a westward appraisal provided mainly three proposition bony between Hard times and Goodan. In Hard Times 1) manginess 2) Oppression of the poor by the upper class 3) Attack on the economic theorist, utilitarian. Again, in case of Goodan he proposes 1) deeply intrigued on the distrust of Dharma. 2) Oppression of the poor by the rich. 3) Confinement of Premchand to depict the ugly expectation of Indian society. If we closely observe thither seems to struggle between both world world of fancy and world of featureualism in Hard Times and world of village and city in Goodan.Goodan presents the life of Hori and his inclination towards unearthly ritual i. e. Goodan and his unable to forsake the concept of his dharma and his life is doomed repayable to his stick bynce to it. The use of the term Dharma by Premchand gives the impression of a take away ring suggesting hypocritical analogously. Hori, hopes that all other would understand and naturally adhere to a traditional code of conduct, but his attitude is non reciprocated. This in any case gives a vibrant picture of problem of social hierarchy as a whole.In Hard Times too, the fact oriented ideology of the characters like Gradgrind and Bounderby can be seen as they opposed any variant of fancy or imagination. Dickens represents utilitarian concept of adherence to fact which is dominant in the novel. Again, a critic points out that the marriage between Lusia- Bounderby can be connected with the character of Hori, as he too maries his elder daughter in marriage to an elderly man, but the discrepancy according to him is that it is Horis helplessness and misery that drives him towards this decision.Some critic flush points out that Premchands bringing out of this concept of marriage gives a parallel treatment of marriage as a whole for the western as intumesce as Indian society. by Hori, Premchand reveals the prospect of Indian farmers giving a warning that life of misery would continue until there is no change in the approach of Indian farmers towards his environment. Through Gradgrind and Bounderby, Dickens produced his product of representing the contemporary purely materialistic, scientifically bent utilitarian theory.A critic posts Goodan far ahead of Hard Times as it seems to a greater extent realistic then Hard Times. There is many instances like the Gradgrinds giving shelter to Sissy Jupe, and Horis giving shelter to Siliya which proposed Siegfrieds attempt of convincing that there can be possibility of acceptation ideas by Premchand Form Dickens. Again, there is also a possible resemblance between lives of Stephen and Hori as both had extreme faith in life and simplicity and honesty are almost akin to Horis dharma. take down their death brings out similarity as both dies with desires that are not fulfilled. Stephens fall symbolizes the destruction of the working class by industrial upper class and Horis death in dicates defeat of the Indian niggard in the face of unbearable odd. There can be similar parallel between characters like Stephen- Richel and Mehta and Malti in Goodan. Both limited roles, suggesting extra-marital affair.Through these characters Premchand represented the immergence of free thinking society. Mehta and Malti exposes Premchands idealism and Dickens depicted realistic form through Stephen and Richel. Premchand posesthe concept of westernization in the cities as well as Malti becomes the target of his sarcasm and satire too in Goodan. At last tomcat and Gobar poises two portal of articulation as Tom suggests natural and nasty influence of the fact oriented society.Gobar seems to be charge by the approach of younger generation. Tom, like Gobar becomes the link betwwn the two worlds. Dickens seems to be hopeful but Premchand exposes his pessimism, his loss of faith in the energy of the Indian psyche to overcome change. This voices the two writers concern in reforming society. No matter how far youve gone down the wrong road, turn back. Turkish Proverb