'Germany experienced a period of political Essay\r'

'Political be hush up, spd base’t compromise, Hindenburg causing problems, lack of cooperation among parties causing polarisation simply no outright revolutions that happened during 1919-24, growing foreign dealings lor crappero/treaty of berlin Economic phylogenesis, result of lorcano regard ast respire blank shell from reparations withal dawes and unsalted blueprint and rentenmark †dawes plan borrowed US gold pinch to change magnitude in crownwork. Later though fulfilment still causing problems and unemployment grant is causing issues, increase in taxes accessible raise, conservative right unhappy and manifests in literature and cinema expressing glory in WW1 contrasts with neue sachlichkiet modern Weimar culture, Bauhaus linking art and functionality.\r\nHighlighting societal issues within Weimar Overall relation prat calm just lack of progress, stintingal phylogeny that in short circumstance and fond progress that non helping Weimar. The ache condemnation 1924 to 1929 are often clock times described as the ‘Golden long time’ but it is debatable to what extent Ger umteen truly experienced semi policy-making calm, stinting information and social progress during this time. Certainly on that point was non the turbulence of post-war Germany and the consequences of the crippling Versaille treaty were not as harsh in this full point but this does not mean it was a time of development and progress.\r\nIt can be suggested that it was not a period ‘of political calm’, on that point was for sure a lot of tension between the variant political parties that do up the many densification g everywherenments in this period, the harm of so many g all overnments alone suggests that on that point were serious political issues. The narrowing of the interests of from each one party meant that it was becoming increasingly toilsome for effective coalition presidential end points to be formed. T he SPD were particularly difficult in this time as they were against compromising with the ‘bourgeois parties’ as they matte a change in ideals would hail and proposed policies handle the Heidelberg Programme which would teach secret ownership of industry be interpreted over by social owners.\r\n on the face of it many parties from the distribute felt this but the SPD had the largest total of seats in the Reichstag, over 150 at their peak in the 20’s, and therefore had the ability to gift the disposal into a stalemate. The SPD’s unfitness to compromise makes the political stage change surface worse when Hindenburg is elected as professorship in 1925. Hindenburg, being a veterinarian of the Franco-Prussian war and the general who won the engagement of Tannenburg was already conservative and took as many steps as he could to stiffen the power the SPD had. Hindenburg also believed the powers of the president should be unre assayed and even blo cked a draft that would limit his ability to engage Article 48. This incoduscive atmosphere meant that by the time the SPD were willing to cooperate with a coalition giving medication, individual interests and polarisation of parties had developed and no one else was interested. wherefore this cannot be classed as a period of political calm due to the stagnant political outline.\r\nHowever, it could be suggested that this tension is to be expected as people are still sapidity the effects of the First World struggle and political calm could be delimitate by the lack of extreme political parties attempting to take over. When this era is compared to the years 1919 to 1924 it is by far a time of political calm as there were no outright attempts at revolution. The years in the lead saw extreme right and left wing idealists try to take over and the fact that this was not attempted during the ‘ flamboyant years’ meant it was a time of relative political calm. This is n ot to mention the successes in Stresemann’s foreign policy, which put Germany back on track to becoming a serious European power at a time again. The admittance of Germany into the league of nations and the signing of divers(a) treaties, such as the Lorcano treaty, meant Germany were in a period of political calm; not experiencing the diplomatic humiliation of the years before.\r\nThe various treaties signed by Stresemann also helped the economic development in this period. The Dawes gained significant investments from the US and the Young Plan reduced the reparations Germany would ask to right, and set a timescale for how long they would deal to pay. This gave the solid ground some ‘breathing space’ to repair and develop its own economy. The young plan, for example, reduced the amount they would have to pay by 1700 one million million million marks than they would in conjunction with the Dawes plan. These plans, alongside the introduction of the rentenmar k meant there was an increase in German capital in this period, which can certainly be classed as a period of economic development.\r\nWhilst there is definitely evidence of economic development in the mid-1920’s it did also experience financial issues. The increase in unemployment, 15% of the workforce were unemployed by 1929, put a heavy strain on the welfare system of Weimar Germany. The macrocosm for paying unemployment benefits had to borrow money from the Government, 342 million reichsmarks, and the parties could not agree how to find this money. The SPD would increase taxes while the DVP would cut benefits. This can be seen as a backwards affect in economic development, as the system did not address the problem of unemployment, but just put up more money to pay it, with the decision of how to pay for the unemployment benefits was hold up until 1930.\r\nThis can be seen as the political sympathies almost shooting themselves in the arse and making a short frontier fix for a long term problem. This short-sightedness can also be argued to be found in Stresemann’s policies, for borrowing money from the US. An international financial crisis would leave over-dependant-on-America Germany in a high amount of debt, which is what happened when the Wall Street Crash occurred. Therefore it can be said that these years were a period of economic development, but that there would be little long term effect on the country from these developments.\r\nSocial progress is probably the plainly contention that can be dead agreed with, with very influential movements like the Bauhaus dominating this period of time, summed up as Neue Schlachkliet. This movement, saw a progression in modern views and an attempt to undermine the Weimar government by exposing the issues faced through literature, dramatic art and film. The need for educational and social disentangle was well documented and although this did not betoken well for the Weimar government it de finitely showed progress in attitudes of the general public. The conservative disposition of many Germans could still be found and also classed as a social progress in the form of anti-democratic literature and films that promoted the glory of the First World war. The twain social ideas both grew in this period, but neither celebrated the Weimar Government so whilst it was undoubtedly social progress it was not productive for the Weimar republic.\r\nThere is definitely a case for political calm, economic development and social progress in the mid-1920’s but they were not necessarily the advances that would reassert the term ‘golden years’. The political calm was only due to a lack of serious opposition to the government but still they could not successfully form an effective coalition government and whilst the economy did improve in this time the provisions made were short-sighted and the country was over-reliant on foreign investments. Whilst social progress was made in this era it is easy to see that the progress wasnot in the name of majority rule and presented the Weimar government with future problems as common ideology differed from what they promoted.\r\n'